Cookies on BBB.org

We use cookies to give users the best content and online experience. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to allow us to use all cookies. Visit our Privacy Policy to learn more.

Manage Cookies
Share
Business Profile

Medical Doctor

Fertility & Surgical Associates of California

This business is NOT BBB Accredited.

Find BBB Accredited Businesses in Medical Doctor.

Complaints

Customer Complaints Summary

  • 1 complaint in the last 3 years.
  • 1 complaint closed in the last 12 months.

If you've experienced an issue

Submit a Complaint

The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

Sort by

Complaint status

Complaint type

  • Initial Complaint

    Date:11/21/2024

    Type:Billing Issues
    Status:
    AnsweredMore info

    Complaint statuses

    Resolved:
    The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
    Unresolved:
    The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
    Answered:
    The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
    Unanswered:
    The business failed to respond to the dispute.
    Unpursuable:
    BBB is unable to locate the business.
    On August 1 of this year I paid FSAC $28,150 to start my VIF program. august 1 was the first time I saw the doctor Buyalos, followed by a second time on august 6. The doctor said it was not going well and recommended termination of the program, but that I could see the ultrasound again tomorrow, august 7, to be sure. So I saw the doctor for the third time on August 7 and was told to terminate the treatment. According to the contract, I incurred a total of 1-3 visits (3 ultrasounds and 3 blood tests), and the clinic was only supposed to charge me $7,900, with the remainder to be refunded. Before I left the clinic, I double-checked with the clinic staff whether I should be charged $7900 and refunded the rest, and the staff gave me an affirmative answer, so I was relieved to leave the clinic. When I got home, the clinic said they wanted to charge me $12,700 because I had been to the doctor 4 times. I questioned that I had only seen the doctor 3 times, but the clinic replied that the online video with the doctor in March this year also counted as 1 visit. I said first of all, I paid $350 for the video with the doctor separately on March, and secondly, the Chinese contract I was given didn't state clearly that the video also counted as a visit to the hospital. Since I am Chinese and my English is not good, it was easier for me to read the Chinese contract. However, the Chinese contract is obviously a deliberate attempt to create ambiguity so that I would be caught in the middle. I have communicated with the clinic many times, but so far the clinic has not given me any reply, from August 7, the treatment was terminated to now November 21, more than three months, not a penny back to me.
    Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

    Business Response

    Date: 11/29/2024

    Dear Better Business Bureau, thank you for forwarding the patient's complaint.  This is the 1st Request I have received, and not the 2nd request as stated on this email.  Due to the Thanksgiving Holiday, FSAC will work on responding to this complaint on Monday, December 2, 2024, and will have a formal reply/response submitted to the BBB by end of day on Tuesday, December 3, 2024. 

    Thank you for your understanding.

    Sincerely,

    D**** *******

    Practice Administrator

     

    Business Response

    Date: 12/03/2024

    Dear Better Business Bureau, I have attached several documents for your reference including the Patient's signed Financial Agreement, which they signed on 7/31/2024. Per the signed financial agreement, the patient understands per page 4 of 8 that the consultation is considered the first visit, which took place on 3/22/24. The second visit took place on 7/31/24, the third on 8/5/24, and the fourth visit occurred on 8/6/24. Therefore, per the signed Financial Agreement, patient is only owed a refund in the amount of $15,800. The patient had been undergoing stimulation, but follow-up monitoring of follicle development and hormone levels showed limited response. Based on the Physician's medical assessment and the patient's hesitation about moving forward, the Physician had recommended waiting for a new menstrual cycle to resume treatment, which was suggested in hopes that the follicles would respond better. FSAC has had a successful medical practice for 25+ years, and our patients have always been our first priority. Therefore, as a good faith measure, we are willing to refund this patient in the amount of $20,250. We hope this resolves the matter with our patient and apologize for any misunderstanding the patient may have had with our Financial Counselor. We would also appreciate that if there have been any negative social media posts published regarding this event, that we would kindly request them be removed as it is our goal to ensure each of our patients are satisfied with their experience with FSAC. We will process the patient's refund by next week. Please let me know if there are any questions regarding this matter. 

BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.

BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.

When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.

BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.

As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.