Cookies on BBB.org

We use cookies to give users the best content and online experience. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to allow us to use all cookies. Visit our Privacy Policy to learn more.

Manage Cookies
Share
Business Profile

Auto Warranty Processing

C.A.R.S Protection Plus Inc

Complaints

This profile includes complaints for C.A.R.S Protection Plus Inc's headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see

Find a Location

C.A.R.S Protection Plus Inc has 2 locations, listed below.

*This company may be headquartered in or have additional locations in another country. Please click on the country abbreviation in the search box below to change to a different country location.

    Country
    Please enter a valid location.

    Customer Complaints Summary

    • 125 total complaints in the last 3 years.
    • 39 complaints closed in the last 12 months.

    If you've experienced an issue

    Submit a Complaint

    The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

    Sort by

    Complaint status

    Complaint type

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:03/08/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I bought a Mercedes benz gl 450 from Victoria inc little ferry nj on nov 26th 2021, I was advised to get Car protection plus warranty. I got the level 3 warranty that took care of transmissions, engines, towing and ect. Then almost 1 year later on Nov 14 the car just shot down on me while I was driving. I had to pay $100 to get it toll because Cars protection plus didn't honor the towing and said they will only cover $50 to get my car towed to a pep boys 15 mins away from me. Pepboys found out I needed a new engine and to make a long story short the warranty Company Cars protection plus has been extremely horrible to deal with. They're absolutely impossible to get through to them. The telemarketers and all there employees are the most rude and disrespectful unprofessional people ever in any business, just look at there reviews and you will know why everyone feels the same way i do. They lie so much, and will do and say anything to try not to honor their warranty, in hopes that there disgusting behaviors will discourage you from pursuiting them. To make a long story short it's been 5 months they haven't fix my car, am a single mom with 2 kids. And am still paying for the car and taking lyfts. Even the people I got the car from tried to help by giving me one of the owners number ****** ************* I called him & when he found out I have a level 3 protection from his company which covers engines and ect. He hang up on me and blocked me immediately. Pls bbb pls help me. I really need a car, this situation is so difficult for me, am taking lifts and still paying almost $500 months car payments for a car that's been at pepboys for 5 months and Cars protection plus refuses to even answer the phone for pepboys and myself.

      Business Response

      Date: 03/10/2023

      March 10, 2023
      RE:          2014
      MERCEDES-BENZ GL-CLASS GL 450 4MATIC
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint regarding a mechanical
      claim and responds as follows:

      There is no open mechanical claim on this customer’s
      vehicle.

      On November 11, 2022, the repair facility listed in the customer’s
      complaint opened a mechanical claim on behalf of the vehicle and CARS’ claims
      adjuster requested an estimate for the repairs be sent to CARS.

      CARS did not receive the requested estimate until November
      23, 2022. The estimate was reviewed and CARS’ claims adjuster contacted the
      repair facility that day, was placed on hold and no one from the repair
      facility ever returned to the call.

      CARS was able to reach the repair facility to quote
      assistance and provide repair authorization on November 28, 2022.

      Due to an error on the repair facility’s part, a component
      had to be added to the mechanical claim and the new assistance amount as well
      as repair authorization was provided to the repair facility on November 30,
      2022. During this conversation, the repair facility was notified of the
      customer’s options on how to proceed with the repairs. CARS could ship CARS’
      supplied parts and assist with the labor or provide an allowance toward the
      total cost of the repairs and the customer could use the repair facility’s
      supplied parts. CARS’ claims adjuster explained that CARS’ supplied parts would
      be aftermarket. This information can also be found in the customer’s attached
      Vehicle Service Contract at highlighted Provision 5. (e.): SERVICE
      CONTRACT CLAIM  PROCEDURES: FAILURE,
      BY YOU OR YOUR REPAIR FACILITY, TO FOLLOW THESE CLAIM PROCEDURES MAY DELAY
      AND/OR RESULT IN CLAIM DENIAL. TO AVOID DELAY, FOLLOW THE CLAIM PROCEDURES
      LISTED BELOW: We have the option to select used, rebuilt or aftermarket
      components when authorizing repairs.

      On December 01, 2022, the repair facility contacted CARS and
      requested CARS ship the water pump due to the difference in price between CARS’
      supplied part and the repair facility’s part.

      On December 12, 2022, the repair facility contacted CARS
      stating the authorized repairs had been completed, the vehicle had been
      rechecked, was burning coolant heavily on cylinder number five (5) and needed
      an engine. CARS’ claims adjuster requested the repair facility tear down the
      vehicle to determine the cause of the failure and then contact CARS with the
      information. Later that same day, the repair facility contacted CARS again and
      requested payment on the authorized repairs.

      CARS has already issued payment for CARS’ portion of this
      mechanical claim and there has been no further communication from the repair
      facility.

      If the customer’s vehicle is still having mechanical issues,
      the customer’s repair facility will need to follow the claims procedures in the
      Terms and Conditions of the customer’s Vehicle Service Contract.

      Regarding CARS’ contact information provided to the customer
      by the dealer, the customer can contact CARS via CARS’ customer service phone
      number at 1-888-335-6838.

      For the customer’s clarification regarding towing, CARS has
      highlighted Provision 2. (c.,vii.): SCHEDULE OF COVERAGE: LEVEL
      3: 24-HOUR ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE: This replaces the TOWING
      benefit. Roadside assistance provides: towing; battery service; jump start;
      flat-tire; fuel, oil and water delivery; and lockout assistance. Coverage is
      provided up to $50.00 per occurrence to the covered vehicle only. To utilize
      this service, You MUST call roadside assistance at 800-418-9836.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment

      Customer Answer

      Date: 03/10/2023

      Better Business Bureau:



      I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********* and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.

      I was told by Cars protection plus that I need to pay $3,500 for my car engine to be taken apart 1st. Then they can have there own investigator come to pep boys and diagnose the car. And based on how their investigator opinion on whatever caused the engine failure of the car then that will decide if it's their responsibility or not to fix the car.

       I don't have $3500 & I know it's 2 risky to borrow money n pay for tear down because this company is not trustworthy. And it takes the months to do anything, while being extremely disrespectful to the clients.  After so many phone calls from myself and pep boys for the same thing for months, they will pretend not to hear from pep boys even tho several times we called them on 3 way, as much as 20 times, before they will actually report it in there computer systems, then they will take another month or so to call pep boys back for anything.  

      So I told them to cancel my contract and reimburse me the balance of my money back from January,  but they refused. They keep saying my case is open, and I keep telling them I don't have the $3,500 so pls close the case and give me a the rest of my money.  They refused and keep yelling at me and hanging up the phone on me. my car is still at pep boys,  am still making monthly payments and taking lyfts, and the car is still not fixed and it's been 5 months. Please please am begging for help this company is awful and heartless.

      Regards,




      **** *****

      Business Response

      Date: 03/17/2023

      March 17, 2023
      RE:          2014
      MERCEDES-BENZ GL-CLASS GL 450 4MATIC
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint regarding tear-down
      charges and cancelling a Vehicle Service Contract and responds as follows:

      CARS [JM1] did
      not tell the customer they owed CARS $3500.00. CARS did ask the customer’s repair
      facility to provide CARS with the cause of failure regarding the requested
      engine replacement. The customer’s diagnostic coverage can be located in their
      attached Vehicle Service Contract at highlighted Provision 2. (a., vi.): SCHEDULE
      OF COVERAGE: a. LEVEL1: vi. LABOR & DIAGNOSTICS: If
      tear-down/diagnostic is requested, We shall reimburse up to one hour of
      tear-down/diagnostic based on Your stated labor rate. EXAMPLES OF NOT COVERED:
      tear-down and diagnosis for a non-covered repair.

      The customer’s repair facility must provide the cause of
      failure for CARS to determine what assistance, if any, can be offered toward a
      repair. This information is highlighted at Provision 5. (c.): 5. SERVICE
      CONTRACT CLAIM PROCEDURES: FAILURE, BY YOU OR YOUR REPAIR FACILITY, TO
      FOLLOW THESE CLAIM PROCEDURES MAY DELAY AND/OR RESULT IN CLAIM DENIAL. TO AVOID
      DELAY, FOLLOW THE CLAIM PROCEDURES LISTED BELOW: c. Your repair facility
      must perform a proper diagnosis to determine the cause of failure and extent of
      damage, which may include tear-down to the point of component failure upon
      Our request.

      CARS has not spoken to a repair facility regarding this
      customer’s vehicle since December 12, 2022 and there is no open mechanical
      claim. If the customer’s vehicle is still having mechanical issues, the
      customer’s repair facility will need to follow the claims procedures in the
      Terms and Conditions of the customer’s Vehicle Service Contract.

      If the customer chooses to cancel their Vehicle Service
      Contract, please have them fill out and return the attached cancellation form
      using the information at the bottom of the form or by emailing it to [email protected]. The
      cancellation would be processed in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of
      the customer’s Vehicle Service Contract. CARS has highlighted this information
      at Provision 7. (a.): CANCELLATION PROVISIONS - ALL REQUESTED
      CANCELLATIONS/REFUNDS MUST BE IN WRITING AND WILL BE PROCESSED THROUGH YOUR
      LIENHOLDER, IF ANY, OR YOUR SELLING DEALER. IF FINANCED, YOU AGREE YOUR
      LIENHOLDER IS A JOINT PAYEE TO RECEIVE ANY APPLICABLE REFUND. ANY CANCELLED
      CONTRACT IS VOID AND WILL NOT BE REINSTATED. a. CANCELLATION BY SERVICE
      CONTRACT HOLDER: You may cancel this Service Contract at any time by notifying
      Us. …After 20 days, or if a claim was made within the first 20 days from
      the Effective Date, You will receive a pro rata refund of the Service Contract price
      for the unexpired term of the Service Contract based on the number of elapsed months
      or miles, less any claims paid or approved for payment, less an administration/cancellation
      fee not exceeding $50.00.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachments

       [JM1]I
      think this may be confusing since the shop would charge the customer.  I think we should strike.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:03/02/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      ResolvedMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      On November 15, 2022 i bought a 2013 kia optima and i paid $1206 to Cars Protect Plus, Inc for an extended warranty for my 2013 Kia Optima. My car started having brake issues so i took my car to Calavan Kia of West Atlanta on February 15, 2023. I had to pay $214 for a diagnostic and they informed me that the Brake Master Cylinder, the brake control module and the brake valve line needs replacing. According to the contract and plan i have with Cars Protection Plus, the business committed to provide coverage if any of the covered parts/components was to fail on the car. The Business failed to pay for the repairs and denied the claims which is covered in the contract. I’ve reached out to the business along with the service advisor at the kia dealership. We were all given excuses and was told different things. The company makes up differences issues with the repairs so they dont have to pay. I feel like i was scammed out my money and they dont want to pay for the repairs on my car. My account number for cars protection plus is ********* and the dealership where my car is located i* ************ and the service advisor name is ******. I would love for them to pay for the repairs on my car or refund me the money i paid for the warranty.

      Business Response

      Date: 03/08/2023

      March 08, 2023
      RE:          2013 KIA
      OPTIMA SX
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint regarding a denied
      mechanical claim and responds as follows:

      On February 22, 2023, a repair facility opened a mechanical
      claim on behalf of the customer’s vehicle for issues with the braking system.
      The repair facility stated the master cylinder was not holding pressure and
      there was air leaking from the brake booster and check valve. CARS’ claims
      adjuster asked what component was causing the failure and the repair facility
      stated the brake booster and check valve. CARS’ claims adjuster explained that
      neither of those components were listed for coverage on the customer’s attached
      Vehicle Service Contract; therefore, any damage caused by those components
      would not be covered either. Please see highlighted Provision 3. (f.): COMPONENTS
      AND EXPENSES NOT COVERED (Applies to all SCHEDULE OF COVERAGE levels): Damage/failure
      to a covered component caused by a NON-covered component.

      On February 28, 2023, the customer contacted CARS and a CARS
      claims adjuster explained why the mechanical claim was denied. The customer
      stated the issue was the master cylinder, not the brake booster. CARS’ claims
      adjuster then contacted the repair facility who said they were unsure which component
      was causing the issues with the vehicle’s braking system; therefore, they needed
      to start replacing parts until the faulty part was found. CARS’ claims adjuster
      explained that the repair facility needed to demonstrate a failure to a covered
      component for CARS to assist. This information has been highlighted at Provision
      5. (c.): SERVICE CONTRACT CLAIM PROCEDURES: FAILURE BY YOU OR YOUR
      REPAIR FACILITY TO FOLLOW THESE CLAIM PROCEDURES MAY DELAY AND/OR RESULT IN
      CLAIM DENIAL. TO AVOID DELAY, FOLLOW THE CLAIM PROCEDURES LISTED BELOW: STATE
      DISCLOSURES: GEORGIA: A proper diagnosis shall include tear-down to the
      point of component failure, performed by the repair facility, to determine the
      cause of failure and extent of damage.

      If the repair facility can now demonstrate a failure to a
      covered component, the customer can have the repair facility open a mechanical
      claim following the claims procedures in the Terms and Conditions of the
      customer’s Vehicle Service Contract.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment

      Customer Answer

      Date: 03/08/2023

      Better Business Bureau:



      I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********* and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.



      [To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, we would like to know your view on the matter.]



      Regards,



      ******* ****

      According to the service advisor they sent in the correct documentation for the repairs several times and the adjuster refused to pay for the repairs. I received a copy of the diagnostic documentation from the dealership and according to service contract with CARS the components were all supposed to be covered. I was told by a customer service representative from cars to take my car to any repair facility of my choice and i did that. I spent $214 on diagnostic testing for my car just for CARs to deny the claim. This company is a scam and if CARS dont want to pay for the repairs i would like the  money i paid for this contract refunded.

      Business Response

      Date: 03/14/2023

      March 14, 2023
      RE:          2013 KIA
      OPTIMA SX
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB response rejection regarding a
      denied mechanical claim and responds as follows:

      As per CARS’ original response the cause of failure reported
      by the repair facility was the brake booster and check valve. Neither of
      these components are listed for coverage on the customer’s attached Vehicle
      Service Contract; therefore, any damage caused by those components
      would not be covered either. Please see highlighted Provision 3. (f.): COMPONENTS
      AND EXPENSES NOT COVERED (Applies to all SCHEDULE OF COVERAGE levels): Damage/failure
      to a covered component caused by a NON-covered component.

      CARS has received no documentation demonstrating a failure to a covered component and cannot assist a repair
      facility in replacing components until the mechanical issue is resolved.

      If the customer has documentation of diagnostics stating the
      cause of failure was a covered component on the customer’s Vehicle Service
      Contract, please have the customer contact CARS at 1-888-335-6838 for
      information on how to submit the documentation for review.

      If the customer chooses to cancel their VSC please have them
      fill out and return the attached cancellation form. The cancellation would be
      processed in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the customer’s Vehicle
      Service Contract. CARS has highlighted this information at Provision 7. (b and
      c): CANCELLATION PROVISIONS: - ALL REQUESTED CANCELLATIONS/REFUNDS
      MUST BE IN WRITING AND WILL BE PROCESSED THROUGH YOUR LIENHOLDER, IF ANY, OR
      YOUR SELLING DEALER. IF FINANCED, YOU AGREE YOUR LIENHOLDER IS A JOINT PAYEE TO
      RECEIVE ANY APPLICABLE REFUND. ANY CANCELLED CONTRACT IS VOID AND WILL NOT BE
      REINSTATED. STATE DISCLOSURES: GEORGIA: After 30 days from the Effective
      Date, You may cancel this Service Contract at any time by submitting a written
      request and returning Your Service Contract to Us. If this Service Contract is
      cancelled, You will receive a full refund of the unearned pro rata Service
      Contract price, less any claims paid, less a cancellation fee not to exceed 10%
      of the prorated refund amount or $50.00, whichever is less.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment

      Customer Answer

      Date: 03/14/2023

      Better Business Bureau:



      I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********* and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.



      [To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, we would like to know your view on the matter.]



      Regards,



      ******* ***** as i stated before the service advisor at kia never told them the cause of the failure was from a brake booster failure. They told Cars it was caused from a Brake master cylinder failure and components of the brake master cylinder(which is covered in their contract) and i have the paperwork attached to prove it and also you can contact the service advisor yourself at the Kia Dealership(******) he also can tell everyone how many times he has called CARS and explained to them that the cause of failure was because of the brake master cylinder and how many times they made of things just say they could avoid paying for my car repairs. It is very clear that this company is a scam. No i wont be wasting my time calling the cars customer service number again all i want from cars is to pay the dealership for the repairs for the “BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER AND THE BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER COMPONENTS OR REFUND MY MONEY RIGHT AWAY!” Once again im attaching the paperwork from the kia dealership and a copy of Cars services that they cover.

      Business Response

      Date: 03/17/2023

      March 17, 2023
      RE:          2013 KIA
      OPTIMA SX
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s second BBB response rejection
      regarding a denied mechanical claim and responds as follows:

      The estimate the customer provided does not provide a cause
      of failure. In order to determine coverage, the shop must provide the cause of
      failure and extent of damage.

      The pamphlet the customer continues to provide is not their
      Vehicle Service Contract. CARS has provided the customer a copy of their
      Vehicle Service Contract in two (2) previous responses.

      CARS is unsure how else to assist as CARS has answered the
      customer’s inquiries several times via the BBB and CARS’ customer service. CARS
      has attached the recorded phone call in which the repair facility states the cause
      of failure is the brake booster and check valve.

      If the shop has any additional updates, please have the shop
      contact CARS.

      Regarding the customer’s second request to cancel their
      Vehicle Service Contract. The customer will need to return the cancellation form
      provided by CARS in a previous response by using the information at the bottom
      of the form or by emailing it to [email protected].
      The cancellation will be processed in accordance with the cancellation
      provisions in the Terms and Conditions of the customer’s Vehicle Service
      Contract.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment

      Customer Answer

      Date: 03/17/2023

      [A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response.  If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]



      Better Business Bureau:



      I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me. 



      Regards,



      ******* **** i will fill out and return the cancellation form to receive my refund 
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:02/10/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      Cars dragged out the process and closed the initial claim saying the mechanic didn't get in touch. He provided me a log of numerous attempts. Once I offered the proof they reopened the claim. I asked for information on where the process was and they refused forcing me to call daily. The staff is incredibly rude, combative and evasive. After literally months they denied the claim. Apparently motors are not covered. Scam warranty company that works with scam dealerships giving people false hope. Completely ridiculous to call a business you are a customer of and have the employees treat you like the enemy. Hard to imagine a car warrenty not covering the block.

      Business Response

      Date: 02/14/2023

      February 14, 2023
      RE:          2000 BMW
      3 SERIES 323CI
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint regarding a denied
      mechanical claim and responds as follows:

      On November 29, 2022, a repair facility opened a mechanical
      claim on behalf of the customer’s vehicle stating that the head gasket had
      failed a chemical block test. CARS’ claims adjuster advised the repair facility
      that there would be an independent inspection of the vehicle and that the
      inspection company would call to schedule.

      Over the next week, the inspection company left multiple voicemails with the repair facility in an attempt to schedule the inspection
      and the repair facility would not answer or return the inspection company’s
      calls.

      On December 07, 2022, the repair facility contacted CARS and
      asked when the inspection would occur. CARS’ claims adjuster explained that the
      inspection company had left several voicemails at the repair facility and had
      not gotten a return call. CARS’ claims adjuster requested the repair facility
      send pictures of the damage and an estimate for the repairs, providing the
      email address to submit the information to.

      CARS did not receive the requested information and the
      repair facility did not respond to the inspection company’s repeated attempts
      to contact them; therefore, the inspection was cancelled, and the mechanical
      claim was closed.

      On December 12, 2022, CARS’ claim adjuster contacted the
      repair facility and left a voicemail explaining that the claim had been closed
      due to the repair facility not responding to the inspection company and requested
      the repair facility contact CARS if needed.

      The next call received regarding this mechanical claim was
      from the customer on January 30, 2023, requesting an update on the mechanical
      claim. CARS’ claims adjuster reviewed the information above and explained the
      repair facility would need to call CARS to have the claim reopened. On this
      same date the repair facility contacted CARS and the inspection was re-ordered.

      CARS has run the repair facility’s phone number through our
      phone system and there were Zero incoming calls
      from the repair facility between December 08, 2022 and January 29, 2023.

      The independent inspection of the customer’s vehicle took
      place on February 03, 2023 and the third-party inspector’s findings are
      summarized below:
      Extent
      of damage: 1.) The technician stated you had to drive the vehicle almost an
      hour, and it will overheat, he stated he
      performed the chemical combustion test, and it turned yellow. When the
      inspector asked the technician if he could show him the test, the technician could
      not. The coolant is low in the radiator, but there were no signs of external
      leaks that the inspector could see due to the repair facility not having a lift.
      2.) The inspector had the vehicle running for a while and there was no
      excessive smoking from the exhaust and while running the vehicle idled smoothly.
      No other demonstrations were given.
      Inspector's cause of failure: 1.)
      The inspector was unable to verify the cause or failure, more diagnosis and tear
      down will be required.

      On February 08, 2023, after the inspection had been
      reviewed, CARS’ claims adjuster called and left a voicemail at the repair
      facility to review the results.

      On February 10, 2023, the repair facility returned CARS
      voicemail and CARS’ claims adjuster explained that the repair facility would
      need to provide and demonstrate the cause of failure for CARS to determine what
      assistance, if any, could be offered. The repair facility stated that these types
      of vehicles often have block rot. CARS’ claims adjuster explained that block
      rot is not covered on the customer’s attached Vehicle Service Contract as the
      engine block is only covered if damaged by an internal component. CARS’ claims
      adjuster explained that if the head gasket failed CARS would be able to assist
      with the cost of the head gasket replacement; however, the repair facility
      would need to provide proof of the failure. The repair facility was not
      interested in providing proof of failure to the head gasket.

      The mechanical claim is still open and in a pending status
      in case the repair facility can provide the requested information as the
      customer’s Vehicle Service Contract has expired and a different repair facility
      cannot open a mechanical claim.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:02/01/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      Roughly 10 months ago I bought a car that ended up being a lemon. The car was purchased with an extended warranty contract with cars protection Plus in March of 2022 for $2500. The company does not cover what was advertised when I initially agreed to purchase it with the lemon I bought from the dealership. Currently I have put almost $4,000 already into repairs on the vehicle. I need a catalytic converter, a fan, and engine oil cooler lines as well as transmission oil cooler lines that need repaired at this time now. The estimate of those repairs is a little under $5,000. The mechanic shop waited 2 weeks for the extended warranty company to get a hold of them and never received a phone call from them after they were sent an estimate. I was advised to call the cars protection Plus and find out what was going on. When I called on January 27th of 2023 after the mechanic shop in I waited almost 3 weeks I was informed that they had to remind their agent to follow up and discuss the claim. It has been an ongoing battle with cars protection Plus to get them to cover what was advertised to us at the dealership as they barely cover a quarter of any of the repairs that I've had to make to my car. The car was a little more than $12,000 to purchase and the service contract was $2,500 and I feel as though both cars protection Plus and Zeller motors company have advertised false services. I have put almost the same amount of money into a car that I'm making payments on to fix it as what I bought it for. It has been almost a month and still have not heard anything back from cars protection Plus. I called the mechanic today February 1st and was told that car's protection was supposed to get a hold of me and they still have not. I would like a refund of at least $1250 of the 2500 that was used to purchase the contract. There is no point to paying for a service that will not cooperate after they have been paid for the service already in advance.

      Business Response

      Date: 02/03/2023

      February 03, 2023
      RE:          2012
      CHEVROLET CRUZE LT
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint requesting to cancel
      their Vehicle Service Contract due to difficulties with a mechanical claim:

      CARS has attached a copy of the customer’s Vehicle Service
      Contract to clear up any confusion over what type of coverage the customer
      purchased.

      Although the customer has never contacted CARS directly
      about cancelling their Vehicle Service Contract, they can do so by filling out
      the attached cancellation form and returning it using the information at the
      bottom of the form or via email at [email protected].
      Regarding how any available refund would be processed, please see highlighted
      Provision 7. (a.): CANCELLATION PROVISIONS - ALL REQUESTED CANCELLATIONS/REFUNDS
      MUST BE IN WRITING AND WILL BE PROCESSED THROUGH YOUR LIENHOLDER, IF ANY, OR
      YOUR SELLING DEALER. IF FINANCED, YOU AGREE YOUR LIENHOLDER IS A JOINT PAYEE TO
      RECEIVE ANY APPLICABLE REFUND. ANY CANCELLED CONTRACT IS VOID AND WILL NOT BE REINSTATED. a. CANCELLATION BY SERVICE CONTRACT HOLDER: You may cancel this Service
      Contract at any time by notifying Us. After 20 days, or if a claim was made
      within the first 20 days from the Effective Date, You will receive a pro rata
      refund of the Service Contract price for the unexpired term of the Service
      Contract based on the number of elapsed months or miles, less any claims paid
      or approved for payment, less an administration/cancellation fee not exceeding
      $50.00.

      On January 17, 2023, the customer’s repair facility opened
      up a mechanical claim on behalf of their vehicle for a catalytic converter,
      electric cooling fan motor, transmission lines and an oil cooler. CARS’ claims
      adjuster requested the repair facility submit an estimate for the repairs.

      On January 27, 2023, after receiving and reviewing the
      estimate, CARS’ claims adjuster contacted the repair facility who stated the
      vehicle was no longer there; therefore, the mechanical claim was closed.

      CARS apologizes this customer’s repair facility had
      difficulty working through a mechanical claim with CARS and if the customer
      chooses not to cancel their Vehicle Service Contract, they can have a repair
      facility open a new mechanical claim by following the claims procedures in the
      Terms and Conditions.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachments

      Customer Answer

      Date: 02/06/2023

      Better Business Bureau:



      I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.


      There has been many times over that the car has been brought to a shop for covered parts that didn't violate contract. Contract is very wishy-washy and double standard in regards to coverage. Feel as though this company has misled customers and their mechanics on purpose and profit from fraudulent claims and ads. Even past repairs that have been made to the car that are covered were paid out of pocket by customer without reimbursement. Im a single mom and busy trying to make a living so when CARS had to be called and reminded that they are being waited on by the mechanic is bad business and is a loss of money out of my pocket that could have been made had I not had to wait for them to do their job. I encourage whoever and the BBB to read my level 3 coverage and compare it to the estimate given by the mechanic. There is no reason that only a fan would be covered and nothing else. Will never recommend this company to anyone or use this company again. Will probably cancel contract in the near future once talk with an attorney because I am not paying a company for being ignorant, lazy, or full of excuses and false claims. 



      Regards,



      ****** ******
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:01/20/2023

      Type:Product Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I’ve had very poor service- I have not been able to use my plan and now I’m told I can’t get a prorated refund -
      I am either told it’s not covered, or you are closed, my shop says you didn’t call back for an authorization- or I paid because you were closed and you would not reimburse my covered repair. Plus your phone support is poor- long hold times, poor hours and rude.
      last 8 of the *** ********

      Business Response

      Date: 01/25/2023

      January 25, 2023
      RE:          2016 RAM
      PICKUP 1500 BIG HORN
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: ********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint and responds as
      follows:

      On June 22, 2021, the customer contacted CARS for
      undiagnosed vehicle issues and CARS’ customer service representative reviewed
      the claim procedures, specifically that the vehicle could be taken to the repair
      facility of the customer’s choosing as long as the repair facility was willing
      to work with CARS and call CARS before anything on the vehicle was repaired or
      replaced.

      On June 28, 2021, a repair facility opened a mechanical
      claim on behalf of the customer’s vehicle for an oil pressure switch and CARS’
      claims adjuster advised the repair facility that CARS could not assist as this
      component was not listed for coverage on the customer’s Vehicle Service
      Contract. CARS has attached the customer’s Vehicle Service Contract containing
      the complete list of covered components.

      On July 02, 2021, a second mechanical claim was opened on
      behalf of the customer’s vehicle for a power window switch. CARS’ claims
      adjuster quoted the repair facility the assistance amount that could be offered
      toward the repairs and requested the repair facility review the information
      with the customer and then contact CARS to obtain authorization. The repair
      facility made no further contact with CARS regarding this mechanical claim.

      On August 02, 2022, the customer contacted CARS requesting
      reimbursement for repairs already completed on the vehicle, a wheel hub and
      bearing assembly. CARS’ customer service representative explained there could
      be no assistance as the repairs were made without an authorized claim and that
      the claim procedures had to be followed. Please see the customer’s attached
      Vehicle Service Contract at highlighted Provision 3. (c.): COMPONENTS AND
      EXPENSES NOT COVERED (Applies to all SCHEDULE OF COVERAGE levels): c. Any
      repair done without prior authorization from US.

      The claim procedures were reviewed with the customer during
      their initial phone call to CARS and can also be located in the Terms and
      Conditions of the customer’s Vehicle Service Contract at Provision 5.

      On January 20, 2023, the customer contacted CARS requesting
      to cancel their Vehicle Service Contract and both a CARS customer service
      representative and CARS’ customer service supervisor reviewed the cancellation
      provisions with the customer. This information has been highlighted as well.
      See Provision 7. CANCELLATION PROVISIONS - ALL REQUESTED
      CANCELLATIONS/REFUNDS MUST BE IN WRITING AND WILL BE PROCESSED THROUGH YOUR
      LIENHOLDER, IF ANY, OR YOUR SELLING DEALER. IF FINANCED, YOU AGREE YOUR
      LIENHOLDER IS A JOINT PAYEE TO RECEIVE ANY APPLICABLE REFUND. ANY CANCELLED
      CONTRACT IS VOIDAND WILL NOT BE REINSTATED. c. After 20 days from the
      Effective Date, there is no refund except in the case of a total loss, as
      determined by the insurance carrier, or repossession by the lienholder, and as long as no claim was made.

      Here, the customer can cancel their Vehicle Service
      Contract; however, there is no refund available. If the customer does not
      cancel they are still able to follow the proper claim procedures and have a
      repair facility open a mechanical claim should the need arise within the remaining
      Vehicle Service Contract term.

      CARS apologizes if the customer feels they experienced poor
      customer service as customer satisfaction is important to CARS. CARS will continue
      to strive to review each customer’s Vehicle Service Contract information with
      them in a timely and professional manner.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:01/17/2023

      Type:Order Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      On 1/10/23, brought the car in for a wheel bearing. Claim denied, even though in contract. Discussed fuel issue, referred to mechanic. Mechanic was refused claim. I contacted Cars protection plus and they refused the claim after sending me to get the repair.

      They accepted the money for the insurance and refuses payment, due to policy. Cars protection plus is a scam..

      Business Response

      Date: 01/25/2023

      January 25, 2023
      RE:          2009
      JEEP COMMANDER SPORT
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint regarding vehicle repairs
      and responds as follows:

      On November 10, 2022, the customer contacted CARS to request
      reimbursement on wheel bearings that had already been replaced on the vehicle
      and to notify CARS that the locking ring module on the vehicle’s fuel pump was
      leaking. CARS’ customer service representative explained there could be no
      assistance on the wheel bearings as there was no authorized claim. Please see
      the customer’s attached Vehicle Service Contract at highlighted Provisions 5. (b.
      and e.): SERVICE CONTRACT CLAIM PROCEDURES: FAILURE BY YOU OR YOUR
      REPAIR FACILITY TO FOLLOW THESE CLAIM PROCEDURES MAY DELAY AND/OR RESULT IN
      CLAIM DENIAL. TO AVOID DELAY, FOLLOW THE CLAIM PROCEDURES LISTED BELOW: b. Your
      repair facility must call 888-335-6838 to open a claim BEFORE any repairs have
      begun. e. Your repair facility MUST provide Us with an estimate for the
      covered repair in order to obtain an Authorization number BEFORE any repairs
      have begun. ANY REPAIRS PERFORMED PRIOR TO AUTHORIZATION WILL BE DENIED.

      During this same phone call CARS’ customer service
      representative reviewed the claim procedures for the other issue. The customer
      asked CARS’ customer service representative if the issue was covered and CARS’
      customer service representative explained that CARS would need the cause of
      failure to determine assistance.

      On November 17, 2022, a repair facility opened a mechanical
      claim on the customer’s vehicle for a fuel pump module assembly and CARS’
      claims adjuster explained that the fuel pump assembly was not a covered
      component on the customer’s Vehicle Service Contract; therefore, CARS could not
      assist with the repair. CARS apologizes for the confusion over this matter;
      however, CARS’ customer service representatives cannot review coverage on a
      symptom only a specific component. In the customer’s attached Vehicle Service
      Contract there is a complete list of covered components the customer can review
      to help avoid any confusion in the future.

      Here, the customer had the wheel bearings repaired without
      authorization from CARS and the fuel pump assembly is not listed for coverage
      on the customer’s Vehicle Service Contract; therefore, CARS could not assist
      with the repairs.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:01/16/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I paid $3000 for a car protection plus plan. My car needs a new alternator. The dealership called car protection plus and was told that they would only cover $300 of the expense (only a small portion). That left me with a $750 bill. The alternator should be completely covered and is not part of the exclusions part of the contract. There is no reason I should be paying $750 when I have a warranty. I should only have to pay a $100 deductible- that’s it. I tried calling cars protection plus 4 times and left 4 voicemails. No one has picked up the phone or called me back. Also I emailed them and no one is responding to my email. It is impossible to get a hold of anyone. This is a scam and they should be sued for not sticking to their contract. It is not okay to sell someone something and then not cover what is in the contract.

      Business Response

      Date: 01/25/2023

      January 25, 2023
      RE:          2019
      NISSAN ROGUE S
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint regarding the
      authorized assistance amount for a mechanical claim and responds as follows:

      On January 13, 2023, a repair facility opened a mechanical
      claim on behalf of the customer’s vehicle. CARS’ claims adjuster used the Terms
      and Conditions of the customer’s attached Vehicle Service Contract to
      adjudicate the claim and reviewed with the repair facility the customer’s
      options on how to proceed. The customer had the option to take the allowance
      for the claim and have the repair facility supply the parts or have CARS ship
      CARS’ supplied parts and assist with the labor. The repair facility stated the
      customer would be using the allowance.

      The customer’s Vehicle Service Contract does not offer full
      coverage, it is designed to offset the cost of repairs. CARS has highlighted
      some important information regarding how this customer’s claim was adjudicated.
      See Provision 2. (a., vi.): SCHEDULE OF COVERAGE: a., vi. LABOR
      & DIAGNOSTICS: The authorized time for a covered repair will be based on
      the Mitchell’s ProDemand labor guide. The hourly labor rate assistance will be
      the repair facility’s rate up to $125.00 per hour. Should Your repair
      facility’s rate exceed this amount, You are responsible for the difference. See
      also Provision 5. (e.): SERVICE CONTRACT CLAIM PROCEDURES: FAILURE,
      BY YOU OR YOUR REPAIR FACILITY, TO FOLLOW THESE CLAIM PROCEDURES MAY DELAY
      AND/OR RESULT IN CLAIM DENIAL. TO AVOID DELAY, FOLLOW THE CLAIM PROCEDURES
      LISTED BELOW: e. We have the option to select used, rebuilt or
      aftermarket components when authorizing repairs.

      Currently CARS is waiting on the repair facility to submit
      the completed final invoice so CARS can issue payment for CARS’ portion of the
      mechanical claim.

      Regarding the customer’s frustration over leaving four (4)
      voicemails and sending an email without getting a response, CARS has never
      received a voicemail from CARS’ contract holder. There were four (4) voicemails
      received from the phone number provided in the BBB complaint; however, this phone
      number does not match the phone number on the customer’s Vehicle Service
      Contract nor was the person who left the voicemails CARS’ contract holder. All
      voicemails were received on the same date the BBB complaint was filed and the
      person who left the voicemails did not leave any type of identifying contract
      information.  CARS also does not have a record
      of receiving an email regarding this customer’s Vehicle Service Contract. It is
      possible that one was sent and did not contain the information needed to locate
      the corresponding Vehicle Service Contract.

      Please be advised that CARS cannot review mechanical claim
      information with anyone other than CARS’ contract holder unless CARS’ contract
      holder has given CARS authorization to do so.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:01/16/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      On Jan. 3rd I had issues with my 2013 GMC arcadia AWD I called the company and explained the situation about the car. Was told that I can call for roadside assistance and they would explain how that worked. I proceeded to call the number that was given to me. When I got in touch with someone from that department they told me that the company only provides up to 50dollars for tow and that I would have to come out of pocket for the rest of the tow. I would have to come out of pocket 152.32 dollars. I got it towed through my car insurance eventually to Midas located in Stamford, C.T. I explained to Midas that I had this company Cars Protection Plus to help with the claim on the car. I gave Midas time to start the claim and to speak with the company. I called Midas back on Jan 5th and they told me the C.P.P did not cover diagnostics and that they reimburse 75 dollars for 1hour of labor for the diagnostics mind you Midas charges 156.54 dollars for diagnostics so again im out of pocket 81.54 dolllars as well for this. The person I spoke to at Midas also explained that since they only pay 75 dollars an hour for mechanic labor that I would have to pay the difference of 155 dollars -75 dollars equating to an 80 dollar difference out of pocket for every hour. On Jan 9 I made my way to Midas I sent them emails at the store giving them the breakdown of the level that the car was covered under. Which is level 3 according to C.P.P. While I was there the associate told me what was wrong with the car. It needs a starter pump and fuel pump. The associate said he was writing a statement and emailing it to them and myself. Now it is Jan 16 I tried to speak to a claims manager at C.P.P first he was very rude. Yelled at the top of his lungs at me did not let me explain anything to him. He also blocked my account for the day claiming that I had someone else trying to do a claim which my sister was on the phone so I can add her on to speak on my behalf because I have a speech impediment.

      Business Response

      Date: 01/23/2023

      January 23, 2023
      RE:          2013 GMC
      ACADIA SLE-2
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: ********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc. (“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint and responds as
      follows:

      In the customer’s complaint they are upset about the dollar
      amount offered to them for roadside assistance, diagnostics coverage and the hourly
      labor rate paid on mechanical claims. The assistance regarding these items is
      determined by the Vehicle Service Contract purchased by each individual
      customer. Attached is the customer’s Vehicle Service Contract in which CARS has
      highlighted the coverage information in relation to these concerns. The
      customer’s chose Vehicle Service Contract labor rate coverage is up to $160.00
      per hour, which is in excess of the repair facilities labor rate.

      On January 03, 2023, a repair facility opened up a
      mechanical claim on behalf of the customer’s vehicle stating the vehicle would
      not start and the stabilitrak light was on. The repair facility informed CARS
      they would diagnosis the vehicle and contact CARS.

      On January 10, 2023, the repair facility called CARS and
      stated the vehicle needed a fuel pump and a starter motor. On this same date
      CARS’ claims adjuster reviewed the customer’s options on how to proceed with
      the repair facility. CARS’ claims adjuster gave the dollar amount CARS could
      offer as an allowance towards the repairs using shop supplied parts OR explained
      that the customer can choose to have CARS’ ship CARS’ supplied parts and assist
      with the labor. The repair facility has not contacted CARS yet with the
      customer’s decision.

      CARS is waiting on the shop’s response.  Once the repair facility provides the
      customer’s decision to CARS the repairs can be authorized.

      CARS apologizes for the trouble the customer had trying to
      give authorization for someone to speak on their behalf. CARS has added the
      authorization to the customer’s account using the written request to the BBB of
      Western Pennsylvania as well as recorded phone calls from CARS phone system.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:01/11/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      This company holds the warranty on my used car, which was purchased on September 22nd and warranties by Cars Protection Plus for 3 months. On December 19th, it was determined by a Subaru dealership that my engine needs to be replaced, which is covered under the terms of this used car warranty with Cars Protection Plus. Subaru provided written documentation of this need for an engine replacement on December 19 (within the term covered by this extended warranty). However, Cars Protection Plus Is refusing to cover the cost of the repair because they said that Subaru did not properly contact Cars Protection Plus to document this claim. However, the terms and conditions of their warranty agreement not explicitly state this must be done by the dealership. This is an example of a business trying to get out of their customer obligations despite clear evidence of this issue existing clearing within the warranty period. The dealer who originally sold me the car (and the warranty) also believes this demonstrates poor business ethics on behalf of cars protection plus.

      Business Response

      Date: 01/20/2023

      January 20, 2023
      RE:          2013
      SUBARU OUTBACK 2.5I PREMIUM
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc.(“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint regarding obtaining repairs
      for their vehicle on an expired Vehicle Service Contract and responds as
      follows:

      In the customer’s complaint they stated that their Vehicle
      Service Contract does not state a repair facility must open a mechanical claim.
      This is not true. Please see the customer’s attached Vehicle Service Contract
      at highlighted Provision 5. (b.): SERVICE CONTRACT CLAIM PROCEDURES: FAILURE BY YOU OR YOUR REPAIR FACILITY TO FOLLOW THESE CLAIM PROCEDURES MAY
      DELAY AND/OR RESULT IN CLAIM DENIAL. TO AVOID DELAY, FOLLOW THE CLAIM
      PROCEDURES LISTED BELOW: b. Your repair facility must call 888-335-6838
      to open a claim BEFORE any repairs have begun. See also highlighted
      Provision 4. (j.): PROVISIONS OF THE SERVICE CONTRACT: j. A claim
      should be opened during normal business hours and while Your Service Contract
      is active.

      This customer’s Vehicle Service Contract expired by date on
      December 22, 2022 and the first incoming call CARS received from the customer
      was on January 04, 2023. CARS has never received an incoming call from the
      customer’s repair facility.

      CARS does not assist with repairs to vehicles that do not
      have active Vehicle Service Contracts.

      CARS hopes this information was helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:01/10/2023

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      12/16/22-current Company is refusing to pay to replace air springs as outlined in tier 2 service agreement with subsidiary Liberty Shield. Was told at first everything was approved 12/16/22. (ABS module and air spring replacement). Then were told the inspector that was sent did not see issue with suspension system(Mercedes gl450 is all but sitting directly on tires.) was told by multiple reps and a supervisor send video of the failure. We sent two videos of car being raised and lowered where u see the spring broken, but was told they need a video showing the air leak coming from the springs. We are getting run of the mill from Liberty Shield as it's a different answer every communication whether I call or my spouse calls. We were even told we would have to pay for another inspector to go visit the repair shop. The first inspector never inspected the actual suspension system and when we asked why not no one can answer that. We just want them to take care of the repair we wouldn't have issued a claim if the contract did not state it's covered. It's been several weeks and we are down to one vehicle because they will not approve and we both work while having 5 children.

      Business Response

      Date: 01/19/2023

      January 19, 2023
      RE:          2012
      MERCEDES-BENZ GL-CLASS 450 4MATIC
                     CONTRACT
      NO.: *********
                     OUR
      FILE NO.: ******
                     BBB
      COMPLAINT: ********

      Dear BBB of Western Pennsylvania,

      The Cars Protection Plus Inc.(“CARS”) Customer Care
      Department is in receipt of the customer’s BBB complaint regarding the
      mechanical claims on their vehicle and responds as follows:

      On November 29, 2022, a repair facility opened a mechanical
      claim on behalf of the customer’s vehicle for a failed ABS module and leaking
      front air struts.

      During the adjudication of this mechanical claim a third-party
      inspection was ordered on the customer’s vehicle and the independent inspectors’
      findings were as follows:

      Extent of Damage: Inspector
      verified the suspension is not rising to proper riding height. The front struts
      were new and there were no signs of leakage. The suspension pump was running
      and stopping intermittently but the system was not responding to the signal
      from the leveling switches. The shop diagnostic is a failed control module. Inspector
      agrees with the diagnosis.
      Inspector’s Cause of Failure: Findings listed are consistent with an internal component failure of the
      suspension control module.
              Inspector’s
      recommended repair: Replace the ABS control module.

      Here, neither the inspector nor the repair facility’s
      technician found a failure with the vehicle’s air springs.

      On December 16, 2022, CARS’ claims adjuster contacted the
      repair facility with authorization for the ABS module clarifying that there
      could be no assistance offered for the air springs as there was no failure
      demonstrated.

      On December 21, 2022, the customer called and spoke to a
      CARS’ claims adjuster who explained the denial of the air springs. CARS’ claims
      adjuster explained there was no failure to the air springs demonstrated and
      that if the failure was to the air supply line or air suspension compressor
      then the repair would not be covered as those components were not listed for
      coverage on the customer’s Vehicle Service Contract. The customer asked if
      another inspection could be completed on the vehicle and CARS’ claims adjuster
      reviewed that CARS would not pay for the second inspection if one was ordered.
      CARS’ claims adjuster also reviewed that the shop could send a video of the failed
      air springs to possibly avoid a second inspection being completed at the cost
      of the customer or repair facility.

      On December 23, 2022, CARS received videos from the repair
      facility; however, these did not demonstrate a failure to the air springs either.
      This information was reviewed with the customer that day.

      On January 06, 2023, the same repair facility opened a new
      mechanical claim on behalf of the customer’s vehicle for front air springs.
      CARS’ claims adjuster explained that due to the repair facility’s inability to
      demonstrate a failure to the air springs during the third-party inspection that
      took place on the previous mechanical claim a second inspection would be needed
      to verify the failure. CARS’ claims adjuster explained that this fee would need
      to be paid by the customer or the repair facility.

      On January 12, 2023, the repair facility called and spoke to
      a CARS’ claim adjuster stating that after further diagnostics on the vehicle it
      was determined that all four air springs had been replaced and were not
      leaking. The repair facility informed CARS’ claims adjuster that the failure
      was actually a leaking air supply line, valve block and air suspension
      compressor. CARS’ claims adjuster informed the repair facility that these
      components were not listed for coverage on the customer’s Vehicle Service
      Contract; therefore, CARS could not assist with the repairs.

      CARS hopes this information is helpful to your inquiry.

      Sincerely,

      The Customer Care Department
      la

      Attachment

    BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.

    BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.

    When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.

    BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.

    As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.