Property Management
The Apartment GalleryThis business is NOT BBB Accredited.
Find BBB Accredited Businesses in Property Management.
Complaints
Customer Complaints Summary
- 11 total complaints in the last 3 years.
- 2 complaints closed in the last 12 months.
If you've experienced an issue
Submit a ComplaintThe complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.
Initial Complaint
Date:01/11/2024
Type:Order IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I was terminated from my lease and told that I did not have any violations and I had no late payments. I believe I was targeted because some of the staff has a friendly relationship with my ex fianc who I had to have evicted because he was abusive. Once he was removed due to a no contact order I was then targeted and then they denied me to renew after I was told I qualified solely. When they contacted me about the lease they included him on as well even after he signed to be removed and I was told he wouldnt be removed. Through all this I dealt with mouse infestation and was told by maintenance that they were under floor between my home and the person under me. Rent was increased without proper fixing of things brokeBusiness Response
Date: 01/12/2024
The Complainants lease was not terminated. We made the decision to not offer a lease renewal. A notice to quit was provided to the Complainant 70 days before her current lease-end date of March 20, 2024. There is no relationship between any of our staff and the Complainants ex-husband and there has been no targeting. All service requests that Complainant has submitted during her residency have been promptly tended to, and will continue to be tended to through the end of the lease term.Customer Answer
Date: 01/12/2024
Not sure if this is for the BBB but how do you say no violations, no late payments and nothing to do with the ex (not husband) but respond that the tenant is banned from renting from any other properties. You only ban someone that has violated their lease or been evicted. Why would you ban a person who has paid rent on time and no issues since 2018 with this company and was at one property for 3yrs and switched to this property 3 yrs ago for more space. No issues in 6 years. There is a reason someone stops renting to a person especially when they have ppl in these houses for 15+ years. You don’t just pick a person unless there is a reason or you are targeting them because of the incident with the ex or someone doesn’t like the tenantCustomer Answer
Date: 01/12/2024
[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed as Answered]
Complaint: ********
I am rejecting this response because:
how do you say no violations, no late payments and nothing to do with the ex (not husband) but respond that the tenant is banned from renting from any other properties. You only ban someone that has violated their lease or been evicted. Why would you ban a person who has paid rent on time and no issues since 2018 with this company and was at one property for 3yrs and switched to this property 3 yrs ago for more space. No issues in 6 years. There is a reason someone stops renting to a person especially when they have ppl in these houses for 15+ years. You don’t just pick a person unless there is a reason or you are targeting them because of the incident with the ex or someone doesn’t like the tenant.
i have spoken to multiple individuals who work for leasing companies and they informed me they want to put you out so they can bring someone in at a higher price, the situation with the ex and worried he could come back or someone in that office just don’t care for because no company is giving up a good tenant that pays on time and exceeds 3x the income required. They can lie and say there is no reason but banning someone speaks volumes and they are hiding behind the PA law of giving no reason. It’s sad that businesses do this to others just because they can.
Regards,
Upset former tenantBusiness Response
Date: 01/12/2024
While we respect that the Complainant does not agree with our decision to not offer an additional renewal, our decision stands. We gave the Complainant more than required notice of the non-renewal so she could find other housing. We will continue to provide customer service consistent with the current lease for the remainder of her tenancy and wish her well in future endeavors.Initial Complaint
Date:10/31/2023
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
Constantly being fine by bogus allegations of noise. Tried to tow my friends car for being there over a weekend Harassment like you couldn't believe Took all my deposit and rent on time after seven years and claimed I was a bad tenant. I moved out because I bought a house but had to pay 2,5 months rent or an inflated abandonment fee. Just a terrible experienceBusiness Response
Date: 11/03/2023
Good afternoon,
Our records show **************** resided with us through 06/07/2023 which was also his lease ends date. **************** provided adequate notice and therefore was only required to pay rent through his lease term/vacate date.
The deposit was used to cover the costs associated with the damages caused by **************** during his stay. (Please see attached images.) During our inspection we found heavy staining on the carpet, the fridge was left very dirty, the stove was destroyed beyond repair and there were items left behind in the apartment that had to be removed and disposed of. For these reasons **. ******* security deposit was applied to the costs of these damages and would not be refundable.Sincerely,
******************
Property Manager
Initial Complaint
Date:05/05/2023
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I had to break my lease and seek tenency elsewhere for a first floor apartment as I am unable to clumb 2 flights (32 stairs) to third floor apartment for 6 months from 8 hospital stays and illnesses that caused massive muscle loss & deconditioning. (Dr's nores provided) ***** *****, ******** ***** employed by The Apartment Gallery management co caused extreme hardship during this entire ordeal trying to swindle away my $3,146.00 deposit without legal cause. After filing a complaint with the MD Attorney general, they conceeded charging breaking lease 2 month fee, after quoting the law they cannot charge this fee if they rent it out and receive rent for same time period they are charging me for broken lease rent. They lost no money. But they have now sent me a deposit return of only $762.07 when it should be $2,248.86 Wrongful charges on Final account statement: 1) incorrect interest of $98 on original deposit of $3,146.00. It should reflect 1.5% monthly interest or $47.19 X 18 months = $849.42 2) Wrongfully charged an NSF fee $35 for last month's rent after they deducted it illegally from my bank account automatically without authorization. After I filed dispute with the bank, the debit was reversed and the last month's rent was paid from deposit they had in their bank account for 18 months. 3) Bogus $80.15 late month payment for same reason as above. 4) Their moveout Inspection statement shows Zero charge for any carpet. all other selections to check off are blank (replace, repair, clean, other) Photos of Second bedroom are attached. They cannot indescriminebtly charge $622.00 carpet replacement just because they want to replace carpet that has furniture or box indentations which are NOT excessive wear or damage and is not cause for replacement congruous with Moveout inspection sheets. Disputing return depisit of mere $762.07 Return deposit should be: $2,248.86Business Response
Date: 05/15/2023
Deductions were made from the security deposit on hand for damages beyond normal wear and tear as allowable under Maryland Law. An itemized final account statement was provided to the consumer as required. Deductions made for damages include replacement of carpet in two bedrooms. Wear and tear age was deducted from the replacement cost of the carpet before the replacement amount of $622.00 was charged. The general life expectancy of carpets within our company is seven years, or 84 months; an age of 36 months was applied for this calculation. The determination to replace the carpet was not made due to the furniture indentations as the consumer believes, but rather was replaced due to actual damage sustained, presumably from the dog that resided in the home. We have attached photos of damages in the home.
As the screen shot provided by the consumer accurately indicates, security deposit interest is calculated on an annual basis. I believe the consumer is misunderstanding this calculation to be an annual rate assessed monthly, however. The State of Maryland provides a resource tool through their government website so that Landlord’s may correctly calculate interest payments. This tool has been utilized and the calculation has been reviewed again at this time. The interest paid on the Security Deposit held for 18 months is accurate and within the legal requirements.
The consumer has made previous claims that an ACH Debit transaction is disputed dated 3/1/23. He claims that this payment was not authorized. Our records indicate that the leaseholder or someone on his behalf, authorized this transaction through a Recurring Auto Draft that was scheduled for 2/28/23 from his Active Building Resident Portal account. A stop payment was then issued by the leaseholder or someone on his behalf, on 3/16/23 to reverse this payment. Rent was unpaid at the time of move out and lawfully owed for the month of March 2023 for the days that the unit was occupied. As possession was not returned to the Landlord until March 29, 2023, rent charges are applicable in the amount of $1,537.94. This amount has been lawfully deducted from the security deposit on hand, along with the standard 5% late fee and a $35.00 returned payment fee as a result of the stop payment. Both the 5% late fee and the $35.00 returned payment fee are listed in the lease as a consequential result for paying rent late and executing a transaction resulting in return payment.Initial Complaint
Date:05/03/2023
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I recently moved into one of their apartments. The apartment was not cleaned at all before I moved in. As I was beginning to do my own cleaning I discovered dead bugs, dirt and grim in the cabinets, broken and water damaged cabinets, holes and cracks in the walls. As well as dirty windowsills and floors. I went to office to see if cabinets could be replaced. They advised only broken cabinets since most of the issues as cosmetic. I also explained the apartment was not cleaned at all before I moved in. This should be done before it becomes available.Business Response
Date: 05/03/2023
Good afternoon,
All concerns shared by ******************** have been addressed or are currently being addressed. Anything we considered cosmetic wear and tear and was not replaced has been notated on her move in inspection form to ensure we have record.
Our staff has offered twice to clean the areas that ******************* has concerns over and both times she has refused. This apartment was professionally cleaned prior to her move in.Respectfully,
******************
Property Manager
Initial Complaint
Date:05/03/2023
Type:Billing IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
On August 25, 2022, my husband and I moved out of ******************* Apartments in Virginia Beach, VA, which is managed by The Apartment Gallery. After moving out, we received an invoice in the amount of $1509.00 (September 19, 2022) claiming that we were being charged for damage to the carpet in the entire apartment and other items. On September 24, 2022, I sent them a letter disputing these charges because we did not cause damage to the carpet. I requested evidence of such damage and evidence that an attempt had been made to clean the carpets (which is a landlord's responsibility under Va. law). In response, they sent me some black and white pictures that did not show the damages they were alleging, and no evidence of an attempt to clean the carpets. In my letter to them, I also pointed out that even if we were responsible, the amount would not be a full replacement cost of the entire 3-bedroom apartment as the invoice stated, but would be based on the extent, cost, life expectancy, and other factors. Their response to me was that "the amount was already prorated" with no information about original cost or breakdown of how it was supposedly prorated. I also believe that if the carpet was damaged, it was more than likely due to leaks in the roof/siding that we would not have been aware of, and not caused by **. I have pictures of the apartment that I took prior to moving out, and the entire apartment was cleaned thoroughly and the carpets were vacuumed thoroughly and appeared in reasonably clean condition. I also have records of a maintenance request that I submitted in 7/2021 because of water pouring into the ceiling and wall of our apartment. The roof was replaced months later, but the interior water damage inside our apartment was never repaired. Rather than correct this, ******************* sent the account to a collections agency: *** ******** **** ********************************************************************* This company has now reported negative information on my credit report. I contacted the collection agency by letter on November 29th, 2022, and again on December 30th, 2022, explaining that this charge was not justified and requesting that they cease collection efforts. They reported the collection account and an additional $500.00 for fees, totaling $1909.00 to at least 2 credit bureaus on March 10, 2023. I have disputed these with the credit bureaus, but that has not been successful. If this were to be heard in a Virginia Court, I do not believe that ******************* would be successful as we did not cause damages they allege and I have evidence that shows that, but I have no desire to file a suit against them for the $30 remaining of the security deposit after they charged over $450 for a bs insufficient notice fee (35 days) on top of the carpet. I believe that they count on most people just paying it in order to avoid collections because that helps their bottom line. I'm not paying for damages that I did not cause. I just want this off my credit report.Business Response
Date: 05/03/2023
The residents in question vacated the property on August 24,2022.
After the move out inspection was completed and the Final Account Statement was mailed out, we received a letter from the former resident disputing all charges on their Final Account Statement and requesting that evidence of the damage and evidence of an attempt to clean the carpet be sent to them at their forwarding address. On 9/30/2022 our office emailed the photos of the damage and the report from the carpet cleaning company to the former residents. The photos that were emailed were color photos. These items were also sent via USPS to their forwarding address on 10/04/2022, as they requested. The photos that were mailed were black and white. We waited several weeks and did not receive a response to those items being provided, so the account was forwarded to collections as stated in their Final Account Statement.
The carpet in question was stamped with a manufacture date of July 12, 2020. It was installed in the apartment on August 8, 2020. The apartment remained vacant until the resident in question moved in on 09/20/2020. Upon move out our maintenance team noticed stains on the carpet, as well as wear that was inconsistent with the age of the carpet and contacted a third-party carpet cleaning company for an evaluation. The cleaning company inspected it and recommended that the carpet be replaced due to permanent stains and excessive wear. The charge for the carpet replacement was prorated based on the age of the carpet at the time it was replaced and the life expectancy of the carpet in our units. At no time did the former resident ask for any explanation on how we arrived at the prorated amount. We would have been happy to provide this if asked.
The roof leak that occurred in July of 2021 did not affect any of the flooring in the apartment. Roof repairs were done by a roofing vendor and some drywall repair was done inside the apartment, but there was no carpet damage. The leak was reported in the pantry area, which did not have carpet.
We’ve provided the former resident with all documentation that they’ve requested. On December 7, 2022 we received a letter from the residents demanding that we make no further attempts to contact them.
I've attached a copy of the carpet inspection report.Initial Complaint
Date:03/14/2023
Type:Product IssuesStatus:ResolvedMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
On 22-December 2022 at 2:51 P.M. I sent email notice to ********************* to vacate my apartment on 20-February-2023.I received email notice from ********************* on 27-December-2022 at 9: 38 A.M. that she had processed my notice for move out on 20-February-2023. Showing my rent prorated from 1-February 20-February-2023 thus creating a zero balance due.Originally I had my walk out inspection scheduled for 20 February 2023. I called and spoke to ***** to request to complete the walk thru on 7-February asking if this would be an issue. I was told No and told that I would then need to turn in my keys after the walk thru.On 7-February-2023 at 10:00A.M. I met with the Maintenance Manger to complete the walk thru. I was informed that I would be charged three blinds and the drip pans for the oven. Due to being ordered to turn in my keys I was not granted the opportunity to correct either issue thus being charged $173.00 for stated issues.On 6-March-2023 I received a bill in the mail for a total of $392.33, $219.33 for insufficient notice fee being for turning my keys in early, at the order of *****.No one in management will provide proof in my contract as to why I have this charge. They have refused to give explanation of damages incurred.On paragraph 44 of my rental agreement, it states that if I move out early all rent must be paid in full prior to leaving which is what I did. There is no documentation of being charged in excess of my lease agreement for handing in my Keys 13 days prior to the end of my lease.I was sent a move out responsibilities document for the first time 12/27/2022 that I did not sign or agree to that she is using as the reason that I am being charged. It only states that if you move out date is above and beyond what I stated that I would be charged. I moved out early not late.Business Response
Date: 03/15/2023
Our staff has reviewed this resident account file and move-out charges as well as all previous correspondence the consumer has had with our site and resident account administration team. Please refer to Paragraphs 3 and 44 of the Apartment Lease Contract. Paragraph 3 indicates that 60-days notice of the move out date is required, and Paragraph 44 indicates that if the move-out date doesnt comply with the 60-day requirement in Paragraph 3 you will be charged an additional months rent. A charge was assessed in the amount of $219.33 as an insufficient notice fee, not the full one-months rent that we could have charged. While the original notice to vacate indicated a 2/20/2023 move-out date, the consumer relinquished possession of the apartment to us on 2/7/2023 by returning keys. Please also refer to Paragraph 45 of the lease which indicates that the move-out date cant be changed unless agreed to in writing by both parties. Had the consumer indicated to us prior to 2/7/2023 that there was a change in the move-out date, a new Move-Out Statement would have been provided to the consumer indicating the $219.33 insufficient notice fee. The insufficient notice fee and rent are two different things. The lease requires that rent be paid for every day you have possession of the home. Insufficient notice fee is required because you relinquished possession prior to 60 days from when your notice to vacate was given.
We have previously provided the following items to you: The Final Account Statement (which is the itemized statement of charges), photos of the apartment damages for which you were charged, Apartment Lease Contract. These items are attached to our response again for the consumer's record.
All of the move-out charges listed on the Final Account Statement dated 2/27/2023 are in compliance with the lease, and they will not be changed.
Customer Answer
Date: 03/16/2023
[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed as Answered]
Complaint: ********
I am rejecting this response because:This early move out fee does not follow Maryland state law on what can be withheld from a security deposit. You must provide how your business incurred those charges, you cannot just pull a number out of thin air and charge me. There was no loss in revenue from me handing in my keys early since I paid my lease term in full and notified you with adequate time that I would not be renewing my lease. I have attempted to schedule mediation through Maryland court resources to resolve this but I was refused. Below is Maryland state law regarding this issue, please take your time to read it over with your HR team as well as take a look at the entire article.
Article - Real Property §8–203
(4) If the landlord, without a reasonable basis, fails to return any part of the security deposit, plus accrued interest, within 45 days after the termination of the tenancy, the tenant has an action of up to threefold of the withheld amount, plus reasonable attorney’s fees.
(f) (1) (i) The security deposit, or any portion thereof, may be withheld for unpaid rent, damage due to breach of lease or for damage by the tenant or the tenant’s family, agents, employees, guests or invitees in excess of ordinary wear and tear to the leased premises, common areas, major appliances, and furnishings owned by the landlord.
(2) The security deposit is not liquidated damages and may not be forfeited to the landlord for breach of the rental agreement, except in the amount that the landlord is actually damaged by the breach.
(g) (1) Subject to subsection (j) of this section, if any portion of the security deposit is withheld, the landlord shall present by first–class mail directed to the last known address of the tenant, within 45 days after the termination of the tenancy, a written list of the damages claimed under subsection (f)(1) of this section together with an itemized statement of the cost incurred.
Regards,
*******************************Business Response
Date: 03/16/2023
Our company has acted consistently with our policies and procedures that are well within the legal parameters of Maryland Landlord Tenant Law. It is of our opinion at this time, that no amount of explanation will satisfy the consumer. We will choose to refund the requested $219.33.Customer Answer
Date: 03/23/2023
[A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response. If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]
Better Business Bureau:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me. Please contact me Via email with final receipt.
Regards,
*******************************Initial Complaint
Date:11/18/2022
Type:Order IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I need to have the company return the remainder portion of my deposit. I rented a townhouse from ********************* in Hagerstown a sub division of The Apartment Gallery. I rented from October 1st 2021 to September 29th 2022. The monthly rent is $1635.00 plus a monthly administrative fee of $12.00 and water fee in the amount of eighty to ninety dollars monthly. My move out amount from September 1 to 29 is $1580.50 plus the $12.00 administrative fee according to the invoice which I paid. The company charged me early move out fee of $54.90 because I returned the keys on September 28, and water/sewer of $109.04.I am contesting those two fees because I had already paid my rent to September 29, and I was physically in the home less than ten days in September and could not have used more water than when I'm there a full month. The first part of September. I was on vacation; on the 16th I removed the furnitures I was keeping, and did not return to the home until the 25th when ************** went to take the donated items, on the 28th a moving truck picked up the remaining donated furnitures and all other items in the home, since the home was empty I returned the keys. I have tried to get answers as to why I'm being charged for September 29th since it was included in the rent, and why my water/sewer bill which has not pass ninety dollars since I have rented the home has suddenly became $109.04; and it was never explained to me why I had to pay $12.00 administrative fee every month. Enclosed are the invoice, rent receipt, and move out statement.Business Response
Date: 11/30/2022
Our system applies payments to fees in the order of which they are charged. I have attached an ending resident ledger to show that the amount of $257.94 was an accurate amount of the consumers final balance due. The final amount of the balance due was lawfully deducted from the security deposit on hand. This $257.94 is actually comprised of $94.00 damage charge assessment for carpet repair,$49.58 water bill assessed on 9/19/22, and $113.96 sewer bill assessed on 9/19/22.
We agree that the contract was to end on 9/29/22, however the resident did return possession of the unit one day prior to this on 9/28/22. Because of this, an early termination fee was assessed for one day in the amount of $54.90. This fee was assessed on 9/28/22. The consumer did make a payment for full rent from the period of 9/1/22 to 9/29/22, but because this charge was assessed on 9/1/22 and then the water and sewer bill were assessed on 9/19/22 the system applied the overpayment of rent to these charges because they appeared on the ledger before the early termination fee appeared.
The billing for the water and sewer was a final billing for the period of 7/26/22 through 9/29/22. Billing is assessed as invoices are provided to us from the City of Hagerstown and are based on actual usage. This amount may seem higher than the billing the consumer was accustomed to because it was for a final two month period rather than the typical one month period. Notification was previously sent to the consumer on 9/19/22, prior to the generation of the final account statement, outlining the billing period and amounts.
The final account statement accurately reflects the deduction from the security deposit in the amount of $257.94. There is no cause for additional refund to the consumer.
Business Response
Date: 12/05/2022
As outlined in our two previous statements to the consumer, the amount that was deducted from the security deposit was not related to rent. With both responses, information specifically detailing the balance due has been provided. There is nothing further to explain.Customer Answer
Date: 12/07/2022
[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed as Answered]
Complaint: ********
I am rejecting this response because:I am taking this complain further. What are my options now.
Regards,
***********************
The Apartment Gallery is NOT a BBB Accredited Business.
To become accredited, a business must agree to BBB Standards for Trust and pass BBB's vetting process.
Why choose a BBB Accredited Business?BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.