Complaints

This profile includes complaints for McCabe,Trotter & Beverly, P.C's headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see Find Local Branches.

close

Find a Location

McCabe,Trotter & Beverly, P.C has 3 locations, listed below.

*This company may be headquartered in or have additional locations in another country. Please click on the country abbreviation in the search box below to change to a different country location.

BBB accredited

Near

Country

USUnited States

Please enter a valid location.

Filter

• 

  McCabe,Trotter & Beverly, P.C

  140 Stoneridge Dr STE 650 Columbia, SC 29210-8257

• 

  McCabe,Trotter & Beverly, P.C

  4500 Fort Jackson Blvd Ste 250 Columbia, SC 29209-1121

• 

  McCabe,Trotter & Beverly, P.C

  880 Johnnie Dodds Blvd Ste 3 Mount Pleasant, SC 29464-3141

The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

• Initial Complaint

  Date:04/11/2025

  Type:Service or Repair Issues
  Status:

  UnansweredMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  i am behind on my homeowners dues due to my wife losing her job. i am trying to catch it up faithfully. on 4/7/25 i dropped off $2000 in postal money orders. I spoke with Ashley G**** at McCabe, Trotter & Beverly. She refused to give me a balance on my account due to not being served the proper paperwork. It seems as if this law firm and my homeowners association < Hinson Management are more interested in trying to take my home. I would like a RECEIPT emailed and mailed to me. I am trying to catch this up as to not lose my house. Neither my homeowners association will give me a BALANCE.

• Initial Complaint

  Date:12/12/2023

  Type:Billing Issues
  Status:

  ResolvedMore info

  Complaint statuses

  Resolved:

  The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.

  Unresolved:

  The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.

  Answered:

  The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.

  Unanswered:

  The business failed to respond to the dispute.

  Unpursuable:

  BBB is unable to locate the business.

  This law firm is either a horrible choice of my HOA... or strategic choice!!!!! During covid outbreak my HOA placed a lien on my home (2019). 2020 when I tried to resolve the issue My HOA had send my file to MT&B. They did not answer for 2 YEARS!!!! When they answered MT&B said they send it to yet another company and now that company won't answer!!!! I have called MT&B over 75xs!!!!! I totally feel My HOA and MT&B treat people like a bunch of Schlemiel's and Schlimazel's who don't deserve explanation, communication or resolution. It's been YEARS!!!!!!! and I have no way to resolve this matter!...Oh!!!! and by the way I sent them several checks that were sent back to my bank!!!! Then they sent me to another collections!!!!! Again! Incompetent or Stategic?????

  Business Response

  Date: 12/15/2023

  McCabe Trotter & Beverly, PC (“MTB”) was
  retained by ****** *****’s homeowners’ association (“HOA”) in June 2020 to
  collect unpaid homeowners’ association dues. The HOA provided MTB with a
  statement showing ****** ***** had not remitted payment for the 2020 annual
  assessment. On July 1, 2020 MTB sent ****** ***** a letter notifying her of the
  HOA’s lien for the delinquent balance. On July 13, 2020, MTB received
  correspondence from ****** ***** that contained a check for $20. The check was
  applied to her account and a remaining balance letter was sent to ****** *****
  informing her that her payment was received and informing her of the balance
  left outstanding. On July 20, 21 and 30 a representative in our office
  attempted to call ****** ***** but was unable to reach her. At the time, our representative
  was unable to leave a voicemail because we did not have permission from Amanda
  Scott to do so as required by the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (“FDCPA”).
   On August 6, 2020, MTB received a check
  from ****** *****. The check’s memo line indicated the check was for “payment
  in full,” however, the check was not sufficient to settle the account. On
  August 6, 2020, MTB returned the check to ****** ***** with a letter explaining
  why MTB could not accept the check. ****** ***** contacted MTB and an
  MTB representative explained to ****** ***** that our firm was only authorized
  to place a lien on her property and the HOA had not authorized foreclosure. The
  representative also explained why her check was returned to her. ****** *****
  was provided with her balance via phone on October 20, 2020. On January 11,
  2021, MTB received a check from ****** ***** and a remaining balance letter was
  sent to her once the payment was applied. On February 3, 2022, ****** *****
  sent in another check and the check was also applied to her account. On January
  3, 2023, MTB mailed ****** ***** a courtesy letter reminding her of her
  delinquent balance. On January 18, 2023, MTB received a check from ****** *****.
  The memo line on the check indicated that it was for “2023 HOA dues”. On January
  3, 2023, MTB returned the check to ****** ***** with a letter explaining why
  MTB could not accept the check with those limitations. On March 9, 2023, MTB
  received another check from ****** *****. This time the memo line for the check
  indicated that it was for “payment 1 of 9”. Our records did not indicate that
  ****** ***** was on a payment plan with our office so we were unable to accept
  the check with the limitations in the memo line. On March 9, 2023, MTB returned
  the check to ****** ***** with a letter explaining why MTB could not accept the
  check with those limitations.
  ****** *****’s account has been in
  collections with our office since 2020. Any checks that were received that did
  not include limiting language were applied to her account. If a check was
  returned to ****** ***** due to limiting language, the letter accompanying the
  check explained the reason for the returned check. A representative from our
  office contacted ****** ***** on December 15, 2023 and assisted her in making
  payment arrangements. It is our hope that we have resolved any issues, but Amanda
  Scott is welcome to reach out to our office at [email protected] or 803-724-5002
  if she needs further assistance. 

  Business Response

  Date: 12/15/2023

  McCabe Trotter & Beverly, PC (“MTB”) was
  retained by ****** *****’s homeowners’ association (“HOA”) in June 2020 to
  collect unpaid homeowners’ association dues. The HOA provided MTB with a
  statement showing ****** ***** had not remitted payment for the 2020 annual
  assessment. On July 1, 2020 MTB sent ****** ***** a letter notifying her of the
  HOA’s lien for the delinquent balance. On July 13, 2020, MTB received
  correspondence from ****** ***** that contained a check for $20. The check was
  applied to her account and a remaining balance letter was sent to ****** *****
  informing her that her payment was received and informing her of the balance
  left outstanding. On July 20, 21 and 30 a representative in our office
  attempted to call ****** ***** but was unable to reach her. At the time, our representative
  was unable to leave a voicemail because we did not have permission from Amanda
  Scott to do so as required by the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (“FDCPA”).
   On August 6, 2020, MTB received a check
  from ****** *****. The check’s memo line indicated the check was for “payment
  in full,” however, the check was not sufficient to settle the account. On
  August 6, 2020, MTB returned the check to ****** ***** with a letter explaining
  why MTB could not accept the check. ****** ***** contacted MTB and an MTB representative explained to ****** ***** that our firm was only authorized
  to place a lien on her property and the HOA had not authorized foreclosure. The
  representative also explained why her check was returned to her. ****** *****
  was provided with her balance via phone on October 20, 2020. On January 11,
  2021, MTB received a check from ****** ***** and a remaining balance letter was
  sent to her once the payment was applied. On February 3, 2022, ****** *****
  sent in another check and the check was also applied to her account. On January
  3, 2023, MTB mailed ****** ***** a courtesy letter reminding her of her
  delinquent balance. On January 18, 2023, MTB received a check from ****** *****.
  The memo line on the check indicated that it was for “2023 HOA dues”. On January
  3, 2023, MTB returned the check to ****** ***** with a letter explaining why
  MTB could not accept the check with those limitations. On March 9, 2023, MTB
  received another check from ****** *****. This time the memo line for the check
  indicated that it was for “payment 1 of 9”. Our records did not indicate that
  ****** ***** was on a payment plan with our office so we were unable to accept
  the check with the limitations in the memo line. On March 9, 2023, MTB returned
  the check to ****** ***** with a letter explaining why MTB could not accept the
  check with those limitations.
  ****** *****’s account has been in
  collections with our office since 2020. Any checks that were received that did
  not include limiting language were applied to her account. If a check was
  returned to ****** ***** due to limiting language, the letter accompanying the
  check explained the reason for the returned check. A representative from our
  office contacted ****** ***** on December 15, 2023 and assisted her in making
  payment arrangements. It is our hope that we have resolved any issues, but Amanda
  Scott is welcome to reach out to our office at [email protected] or 803-724-5002
  if she needs further assistance. 

  Customer Answer

  Date: 12/19/2023

  
  
  Better Business Bureau:
  
  
  
  I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ********, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
  
  
  
  
  Sincerely,
  
  
  
  ****** *****