Cookies on BBB.org

We use cookies to give users the best content and online experience. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to allow us to use all cookies. Visit our Privacy Policy to learn more.

Manage Cookies
Share
Business Profile

Lawyers

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP

Complaints

This profile includes complaints for Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP's headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see

Find a Location

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP has 41 locations, listed below.

*This company may be headquartered in or have additional locations in another country. Please click on the country abbreviation in the search box below to change to a different country location.

    Country
    Please enter a valid location.

    Customer Complaints Summary

    • 552 total complaints in the last 3 years.
    • 104 complaints closed in the last 12 months.

    If you've experienced an issue

    Submit a Complaint

    The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

    Sort by

    Complaint status

    Complaint type

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:11/03/2022

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      This firm sent me a collection notice from a traffic violation that NEVER OCCURRED in *********** dated over seven years ago. I checked with the court and case number they cited and there is no record of the case. I can only assume that Linebarger, Goggan, Blair and Sampson are involved in some kind of Phishing scheme and sending out 7 year old claims that cant be verified seems to be evidence of that.

      Business Response

      Date: 11/09/2022

      *************** to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ***************************. Mr. ******** complaint regards an account owed to our client, the County of Los Angeles Superior Court.

      We reviewed the account with our client after receiving the complaint. The Court verified that $541 is currently due for case no. #C296049. ****************** was issued a citation for failing to stop at a red signal on July 30, 2015 at ********** and Washington Bvld in *****************. A copy of the citation is attached. A Civil Assessment Notice was mailed to ****************** on December 1, 2015 notifying him of a $300 civil assessment fee. A copy of this notice is also attached.  As a result of legislation, the $300 civil assessment was credited to the account on August 25, 2022. The current balance currently due is $541.

      Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint.   We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint.   In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:11/02/2022

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I received this collection notice on November 1st 2022 and it states the fees are due on October 25th 2022 for a Red signal vehicle, 1st problem I have with this notice is I received it 1 week past due from the due date and 2nd none of my vehicle plate information is included on this notice. I own 2 vehicles, what vehicle is the violation for and what date was the violation comited? I would like proof of a photograph with me in the driver seat, once I receive this documentation I will have my attorney review them and contact your firm. On this letter I received shows no vehicle information so please for future reference at least include the vehicle information to avoid any confusion. I will be waiting for your response, thank you.

      Business Response

      Date: 11/09/2022

      *************** to the consumer complaint filed with your office by *************************. Mr. ******* complaint regards an account owed to our client,the County of Los Angeles Superior Court.

      We reviewed the account with our client after receiving the complaint. The Court verified that $490 is currently due for case no. #CA40896. **************** was issued a citation for failing to stop at a red light on October 7, 2017 at Garfield and Telegraph in Commerce. The vehicle license no.was *******. A copy of the citation is attached. A Civil Assessment Notice was mailed to **************** on January 19, 2018 notifying him of a $300 civil assessment fee. A copy of this notice is also attached.  As a result of legislation, the $300 civil assessment was credited to the account on August 25, 2022. The current balance currently due is $490.

      Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint.   We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint.   In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:11/02/2022

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      Received violation for 2014 metro train violation of use without ticket. Showed in court and officer did not appear. **** was dismissed and I was informed there was nothing more I need to do. I haven't received anything from the courthouse since 2014, other than a blue piece of paper stating case dismissed.Yet on 10.21.22 I received a collections notice from Linebarger Goggan *********************************************** with an inflated amount due of $560.00. I telephoned to inquire what this was for and they directed to me to court house. I telephoned the courthouse as well as searched online- they have no case for **** am extremely frustrated since this was dismissed back in 2014 and to have this notice come without any prior attempts for over eight years is unsettling. I have not changed residence and would have seen something come sooner.

      Business Response

      Date: 11/07/2022

      *************** to the consumer complaint filed with your office by *********************. ************** complaint regards an account owed to our client, the County of Los Angeles Superior Court.

      We reviewed the account with our client after receiving the complaint. The Court verified that $560 is currently due for case no.#AA121145. ************** was issued a citation on June 11, 2014. ************** signed the citation with a promise to appear in court on August 26, 2014. A copy of the citation is attached.

      Court records indicate that ************** did not appear for the court hearing. On September 16, 2014, bail was issued for $875 after a $15 warrant fee and a $300 civil assessment were added to the amount due after the failure to appear. The court document is attached. As a result of legislation,on January 8, 2022, the $15 fee was credited to the account and on 08/25/22,the $300 civil assessment was credited to the account. The current balance currently due is $560.

      Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint.   We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint.   In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:11/02/2022

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I received a Notice of Intent to Intercept Filing from the Linebarger ************************************************ LLP attorney at Law for a pass due collection of a moving violation back in 2019. I tried calling the law firm to get details of this moving violation as do not remember ever getting a ticket for a red light at any time and every time I call they place me on hold for a long time or don't answer or pass me on another number that does not pick-up. They claim the ticket is from 9/13/19 and the case number is CA79475 and describe the violation as VC21453 (C)-I RED ARROW VEHICULAR. CASE number 52362043.Charge: $490.00 There are too many questions that make think this is a scam, particularly when I read of so many other people complaining about this law firm. Is this a legit charge, or law firm? How can I stop them from all the harassments and threats.

      Business Response

      Date: 11/04/2022

      *************** to the consumer complaint filed with your office by *************************. Mr. ******** complaint regards an account owed to our client, the County of Los Angeles Superior Court for an unpaid traffic citation.

      We reviewed the account with our client after receiving the complaint. The Court verified that $490 is currently due for case no. #CA79475. ****************** was issued the photo enforced citation for failing to stop at a red light on September 13, 2019 at *************. and ************. A notice of Traffic Violation  was mailed to ****************** on September 19, 2019. A Notice of Delinquency was mailed to ****************** on December 21, 2019 notifying him of a $15 fee and $300 civil assessment. As a result of legislation, on January 8, 2022, the $15 fee was credited to the account and on 08/25/22, the $300 civil assessment was credited to the account.The current balance currently due is $490. Both notices are attached to this response.

      Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint.   We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint.   In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/31/2022

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      ***************** trying to collect fines and fees for a jurisdiction where I don't live and have never been. Involves case #********lcx in Pinellas county ******* for a camera instituted violation. Amount is $358.75. They threaten my credit for something that is not me or anyone I know.

      Business Response

      Date: 11/09/2022

      *********************:

      On behalf of Linebarger Goggan Blair &Sampson, LLP (Firm), I am responding to the complaint filed with the Better Business Bureau (BBB) in regard to the Firms collection efforts on behalf of the Clerk of Court for Pinellas County, ** (Clerk) for Case No. 13007790LCX (the Traffic Case). Upon receipt of this complaint, we placed the Traffic Case in a stop work status for review.

      The Firm represents the Clerk in the collection of delinquent court fees and fines. The Clerk forwarded the Traffic Case to our Firm as payment obligations related to this case have become delinquent. 

      The Traffic Case stems from a ******* Uniform Traffic Citation being issued in your name in accordance with ******* Statute Section ******** based on your alleged failure to stop at a red light in violation of ******* Statute Section *******. Pursuant to ******* Statute Section ********(1)(c), a traffic citation for failing to stop at a red light is issued by mailing the traffic citation to the address of the registered owner of the motor vehicle. In the case of joint ownership of a motor vehicle, the traffic citation is mailed to the first person appearing on the registration. Fla. Stat. ********(c)(1)(c) (2022). I have enclosed a copy of this citation for your review. According to court records, the citation appears valid as there is no decision of the Pinellas County Court rendering the citation invalid. We have also confirmed with the Clerk that the obligation is still outstanding. I would encourage you to view the video footage and photos of the incident available online. The website is www.ViolationInfo.com, and the login information in the form of the notice number and pin number are located on the upper right-hand side of the enclosed citation.

      Unfortunately, the Firm does not have the authority to modify the outstanding obligation related to the Traffic Case or to transfer the liability for the citation.  However, if you would like to dispute the citation and/or request a transfer of the liability for the citation, you will need to file an affidavit as described in ******* Statute Section ******** and request a hearing with the Pinellas County Court. As a courtesy, the Firm has placed this account in a stop work status in the Firms system for a period of 90 days to provide you with an opportunity to dispute the citation or to attempt to reassign liability.  By placing your account in a stop work status, the Firm will cease collection efforts during this time.However, please note that all enforcement mechanisms will remain in place during this time unless the Pinellas County Court alters the legal status of the citation.

      I hope this is enough to satisfy your inquiry.  Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at ************.

      Best Regards,

      *************************, Esq.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/31/2022

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I received a letter from this company claiming $81.37 worth of "past due" bills. They are collecting on behalf of a toll company in ********. I have never been to ******** nor do I own a vehicle with the license plate ******. They are stating this will affect me getting a registration for my car. I would like this claim removed ASAP they state they need proof via mail. I have no way of providing proof that I am not associated with that license.

      Business Response

      Date: 11/02/2022

      *************** to the consumer complaint filed with your office by *********************. Ms. ****** complaint regards an account for unpaid tolls and fees owed to our client, the ********* River Tunnels (ERT).

      Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account with our client, ERT. Our client has advised us that after reviewing the account the customer was billed incorrectly. The full balance has been removed and the customer is no longer responsible for the $81.37, the account has a $0.00 balance. There is no further amount due by ************* in our system. Please note that the firm does not credit report on behalf of any of its clients.

      Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint.   We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint.   In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/31/2022

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I received a letter from Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP on October 30, 2022. This letter states that I owe a debt with ********* River Tunnels for unpaid tolls and that they had previously sent me a letter informing me of this. For starters, I have never received a letter or I would have disputed it then, and even though this letter includes my license plate number, it does not include a date as when I supposedly entered the ********* River Toll, nor did it include a copy of my license plate; which are all required when trying to states someone used a toll! I have never been through this ********* River Tunnel and even if I had....$64.30 toll fee? This is clearly a scam and I want it shut down immediately!

      Business Response

      Date: 11/02/2022

      *************** to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ************************  Ms. ****** complaint regards an account for unpaid tolls and fees owed to the ********* River Tunnels (ERT).

      The complaint requested no further contact from the Firm, so this response is submitted to just the BBB, and not to the complainant. The BBB is, of course, welcome to share this response with the complainant.

      Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account with our client.  Per ERT, the charges were valid.  ************** made a payment after the due date, which led to additional fees being added to the account.  As a one-time courtesy, ERT has waived both fees, leaving a $0.00 balance.

      Please note that the firm does not credit report on behalf of any of its clients.

      We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint.   In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/31/2022

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I am active duty military previously stationed in ***** **. There is a toll i used to regularly use (BIDDLES40) which cost one dollar. While I lived in ***** I had 5 toll violations all within about a month, 2019/06/13 till 2019/07/06 totalling $8.50. **I have had no notice of said tolls** . I have had orderes to serve in ***** ***** starting 01/2020, and finally get the second notice today 2022/10/31. This has remained unpaid, and fees tacked on for years without my knowlege or any hope to provide my side of the argument. Now, what was a toll less than $10 has turned into them demanding an exorbitant $440. I understand paying high fees as penalties for toll violations, but this is outragious.

      Business Response

      Date: 11/04/2022

      *************** to the consumer complaint filed with your office by **************************  Mr. ****** complaint regards an account for unpaid tolls and fees owed to our client, the ******** ********** of ************** (DelDOT).

      Between June 13, 2019, and September 20, 2019, DelDOT recorded eleven tolls incurred by a motorcycle with ******** license plate *******, registered to **************************  DelDOT mailed multiple Notices and Final Notices on September 26, 2019 and November 19, 2019 respectively. DelDOT indicates that the dates of the tolls were as follows: June 13, 14, and June 22, 2019, as well as July 4, and 6, 2019. The notices were properly mailed to the address provided by the ********** of ***** Vehicles (DMV); ********************************************************, Dover, ** 19901-2246.  Please note that the addresses used for these mailed notices are based on DMV records and it is the responsibility of the registered owner to keep the address up to date.

      As the notices remained unresolved beyond the due dates,****** referred the delinquent tolls and fees to the firm on September 24,2021.  A letter was mailed on October 21, 2021, in the amount of $446.00.  The firm continuously attempted to contact ************** to resolve this debt and was able to locate a new address; PSC 78 **********************************; A letter was mailed to ************** on June 22, 2022, and another letter was mailed on August 13, 2022, both in the amount of $446.00. No response was ever received by the firm.

      Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account with the client.  Per DelDOT, the debt is valid.  As such, the current balance due of $446.00 remains due and owing.  ************** stated he was deployed out of the country in January 2020, after the dates of the transactions (11 tolls between June 13, 2019, to September 20, 2019) and the notices mailed by ****** (September 26, 2019 and November 19, 2019).  It should be noted that no additional amounts owed were incurred after Mr. ****** deployment in 2020.

      ************** continued to use E-ZPass express lanes without an E-ZPass.  In order to support a dispute regarding the registered address,************** will need to show documentation of his vehicle registration at the time the tolls were incurred.  Note that all violations were sent to the address, ***********************************************************************************, with the exception that the last seven of the total eleven violations were sent without including the apartment number.  Those seven violations can be re-issued to a current address, at which time ************** will only be eligible to appeal one of the violations at the balance of the toll only, and the other six violations will be reverted to the value set in the first notice (the toll plus the $50 fee) and would remain due in full.  The remaining four tolls remain due and owing at the current amount owed.  

      Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

      Customer Answer

      Date: 11/04/2022

      Complaint: 18335774

      I am rejecting this response because:

      *** DOT, despite having the correct address on file, still mailed the violations to the incorrect address (a incomplete address). Of which I had no idea there were more violations, above the four that I had origionally complained about. Additionally, of the origional toll fee, the "violations mark up" is OVER FIVE THOUSAND PERCENT. It is insanity to ask so much from so little as I cannot accept that is what is due. I moved from **** N ****** hwy around Dec 2018, so I never had the chance to pay the toll with the additional fee. I received notification of moving out of the country around May 2019. So naturally, updating the address at the time was not relevant. I should be granted the oppertunity to pay the origional toll with fee. I am filing this complaint in good faith as I do intend to pay, because a toll violation was commited. However, being blindsided a couple years down the road, in a foreign county with all time high inflation, while deployed, is not a good way to do business. I even missed the window for the AMNISTY PROGRAM, of which I would have qualified and easily paid any fees HAD I KNOWN OF THEM****. All toll violations need to be reassessed. 


      Regards,

      *************************

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/31/2022

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      Received a fraudulent collections letter. Says I owe $1186.00 for a ********** traffic warrant. Called ********** courts. It's false. They've never heard of the case. These people are literally trying to steal from me.

      Business Response

      Date: 11/07/2022

      *************** to the consumer complaint filed with your office by **********************. Mr. ****** complaint regards an account owed to our client, the County of Los Angeles Superior Court.

      We reviewed the account with our client after receiving the complaint. The Court verified that $1,186 is currently due for case no.#*******. ************** was issued a citation on January 21, **** for driving with an expired registration, not having registration in the vehicle, and not having proof of insurance. ************** signed the citation with a promise to appear in court on March 11, ****. A copy of the citation is attached.

      ************** did not appear in Court as promised and on May 31,****, the amount of the citation increased to $1,451. On September 21, ****, an arraignment was scheduled but ************** failed to appear. On March 10, 2006,another arraignment was scheduled and ************** failed to appear again. On March 20, 2006, the amount of the citation increased to $1,501. As a result of legislation, on January 8, 2022, a $15 fee was credited to the account and on 08/25/22, a $300 civil assessment fee was credited to the account. The current balance currently due is $1,186.

      Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint.   We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint.   In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
    • Initial Complaint

      Date:10/31/2022

      Type:Billing Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      I had received another letter from this law firm claiming I have delinquent court fines from ***********************. I received the same letter last year and had ignored it since I had moved out of state July 2018 and had never gone to ******* while I was living in **. This was for a supposed traffic cam violation but I had never received anything before about this while I was still living in WA and I had my ************** when I relocated. I also contacted *********************** last year when I received the initial letter to inquire about this and gave them my name along with license plate number and make and model of my car. They told me there was no record of anything. So I considered the letter from this business to be a complete scam. The contact needs to stop since they have clearly either gotten the wrong information for someone with the same name or is a scam business.

      Business Response

      Date: 11/10/2022

      Dear ********************:
      On behalf of Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP (the Firm), *************** to the above complaint received from your office on October 31, 2022. This complaint regards Photo Enforcement Red Light ticket #*********, which was issued to a **** ****** Maxima with **** plate number B744EK on April 23, 2013 at 6:41pm (copy attached), under the authority of RCW 46.63.030 46.63.030 46.63.030 (1)(d)(1)(d) (1)(d)(1)(d) (automated traffic safety cameras).


      At the time of the violation, the ************* showed Ms. ************************* as the registered owner of said vehicle. Pursuant to RCW 46.63.170(1)(f), The registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an infraction under RCW 46.63.030(1)(d) unless the registered owner overcomes the presumption in RCW 46.63.075 .


      At the time the infraction occurred, the vehicle was registered with the ************* DMV at ************************************************************************. Notice was sent to that address by our client, ************************, on 05-31-2013. When our client placed the account with our office on September 30, 2021, we obtained a new address for **************** of ***************************************************************. We mailed notifications to that address on 10-14-2021 and 10-20-2022.


      Our client confirms that the account is valid and unpaid. The outstanding balance is $128.50.


      Should you need additional information, please feel free to contact us.


      Sincerely,
      *****************************
      Attorney at Law
      Encl.

    BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.

    BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.

    When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.

    BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.

    As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.